EUR/USD
1.14723
0.455%
Gold
4060.82
0.200%
Oil
79.235
0.106%
USD/JPY
162.024
-0.146%
GBP/USD
1.35415
1.128%
GBP/JPY
219.410
0.979%
Real-time News
On July 16th, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf issued a statement on the latest developments regarding the war and the domestic situation on the evening of the 15th local time. Ghalibaf stated that Iran has never welcomed war, but in order to safeguard national security and interests, it must be prepared for battle at all times and must exert every effort. Ghalibaf pointed out that Iran should also utilize diplomatic and negotiating means to achieve and consolidate its national interests. Ghalibaf stated that a memorandum of understanding is only meaningful if all its provisions are valid and being implemented. If Iran cannot benefit from a memorandum of understanding, there is no reason to abide by it. Ghalibaf stated that everyone in Iran has a responsibility to make efforts, according to the Supreme Leaders instructions, for war, diplomacy, or both.July 16 – Three U.S. officials stated that the recent series of U.S. strikes against Iran were aimed at forcing it to open the Strait of Hormuz, and also at targeting Irans military capabilities, which the U.S. hopes to destroy before undertaking more complex operations against Iran. The recent strikes have effectively enhanced Trumps additional military options. The U.S. military stated that its latest airstrikes targeted Iranian air defense systems, coastal radar stations, missile and drone bases, as well as small vessels and other maritime assets. One U.S. official stated that these strikes can be seen as "shaping operations," weakening Irans defense capabilities to allow for more intensive U.S. military operations in the future. "This helps lay the groundwork for necessary follow-up work," the official said.Three U.S. officials said the recent U.S. strikes against Iran are increasing the U.S.s options for further escalation.July 16th - According to CBS, the U.S. Department of Defense recently assessed military action options against Cuba, including a large-scale air assault option carried out by the 101st Airborne Division. Sources familiar with the matter stated that these discussions do not indicate that the Trump administration has decided to take action. Currently, a large portion of U.S. military resources are concentrated in the Middle East, limiting the likelihood of action against Cuba. The U.S. has indicated it still prefers to push for reforms in Cuba through diplomatic and economic pressure. The Pentagon responded that it would not comment on hypothetical military action.According to CBS: The United States has explored the possibility of launching airstrikes against Cuba.
