• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On February 9th, Zhejiang Jike Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., entrusted by Zhejiang Geely Automobile Co., Ltd., filed a recall plan with the State Administration for Market Regulation in accordance with the "Regulations on the Recall of Defective Automobile Products" and the "Implementation Measures for the Regulations on the Recall of Defective Automobile Products." The recall number is S2026M0023V: Starting March 6, 2026, a total of 38,277 Jike 001WE version vehicles manufactured between July 8, 2021 and March 18, 2024 will be recalled. Due to manufacturing inconsistencies in the high-voltage power battery components, prolonged use in some vehicles within this recall scope may cause an abnormal increase in the internal resistance of the power battery, potentially leading to a decline in the performance of some power batteries. In extreme cases, this could result in thermal runaway of the power battery, posing a safety hazard.February 9th - Shanghai NIO Automobile Co., Ltd., in accordance with the "Regulations on the Recall of Defective Automobile Products" and the "Implementation Measures for the Regulations on the Recall of Defective Automobile Products," has filed a recall plan with the State Administration for Market Regulation. Recall number S2026M0017I: Effective immediately, 246,229 ES8, ES6, and EC6 pure electric vehicles manufactured between March 16, 2018, and January 16, 2023, will be recalled. Due to a software issue, some vehicles within the recall scope may experience a brief blackout of the instrument panel and central control screen under certain conditions, during which time the driver will be unable to receive necessary vehicle information and functions (such as vehicle speed information, fault alarm prompts, defrosting and defogging functions, etc.), posing a safety hazard.On February 9th, Mindray Electronics stated in an investor relations activity that Guangxin Microelectronics first-phase planned capacity is 100,000 6-inch silicon-based power devices per month. Currently, it is in a healthy expansion phase, with output increasing from 6,000 wafers/month at the beginning of 2025 to 40,000 wafers/month by the end of the year. The products currently in mass production are mainly MOS field-effect diodes (MFER, 45V–200V) and vertical double-diffused metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (VDMOS, 60V–2,000V), with an average monthly output of approximately 12,000 MFERs and approximately 26,000 VDMOSs.On February 9th, AVIC Optoelectronic released its preliminary financial results, reporting total operating revenue of RMB 21.301 billion in 2025, a year-on-year increase of 2.98%; net profit was RMB 2.124 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 36.69%. Facing a complex and volatile external environment and cyclical fluctuations in the industry in 2025, the company persevered, achieving operating revenue of RMB 21.301 billion for the year, maintaining overall stable growth; total profit and net profit attributable to shareholders were RMB 2.664 billion and RMB 2.124 billion, respectively, representing year-on-year decreases of 29.24% and 36.69%.Indias fuel sales rose 2.9% year-on-year in January, with diesel sales up 3.3% and gasoline sales up 6.1%.

Starbucks Requests Equal Time With The White House After Biden Meets With Union Leaders

Haiden Holmes

May 07, 2022 10:14

S2.png


Starbucks Corp has requested a meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden's administration after unionized staff met with White House officials on Thursday, stating in a statement that the majority of its workers do not wish to join a union.


Separately, an officer with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) filed a complaint on Friday alleging alleged violations of U.S. labor law by Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) against union members. Starbucks stated that the charges contained in the complaint are untrue and meritless.


Starbucks expressed "great concern" in a letter to the White House, dated Thursday and revealed on Friday, that Workers United, which is organizing hundreds of U.S. Starbucks outlets, was invited to a meeting without Starbucks officials. White House officials declined to respond.


On Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden met with workers and labor organizers aiming to represent Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), Starbucks, and other firms' employees.


Christian Smalls, leader of the Amazon Labor Union, and Laura Garza, a Starbucks employee working with Workers United, were among the attendees.


During the discussion, Biden reportedly stated, "When I ran for president, I pledged to be the most pro-labor, pro-union president in American history," according to video extracts released by the White House on Friday.


Starbucks stated in the letter that its lack of representation "disregards the fact that the majority of our partners oppose union membership and Workers United's unionization techniques." The coffee chain's baristas and other employees are referred to as partners.


Workers at more than 50 U.S. Starbucks cafés have chosen to join Workers United, while five outlets have voted against the union, out of over 240 that have held elections since August. Workers United is a Service Employees International Union affiliate.


Starbucks said, "We have a significantly more optimistic outlook for our partners and our organization than Workers United."


Workers United tweeted a message from Garza, who stated that Starbucks' reaction was "heartbreaking to read." She stated that she was honored to represent all Starbucks partners, union or not, at the conference.


In a complaint accessed by Reuters, the regional director for Buffalo, New York, of the National Labor Relations Board cited allegations presented to the agency by Workers United, including assertions that Starbucks threatened, dismissed, and conducted surveillance on union members in the state.


Regional Director Linda M. Leslie's lawsuit asserts that Starbucks' conduct, as alleged in the claims, violates the National Labor Relations Act. On July 11, a judge from the NLRB will hold a hearing regarding the claims, according to the lawsuit.


Starbucks stated in a statement that the complaint raises significant concerns but "does not establish an NLRB conclusion."


They added: "It is the start of a legal proceeding that allows both parties to be heard and present evidence. We think that the allegations in the complaint are untrue, and we look forward to presenting our evidence when the charges are adjudicated."