• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On February 14th, Faraday Future announced that its Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, scheduled for February 13th, 2026 (Pacific Time), has completed the review and approval of relevant resolutions. At this meeting, shareholders approved a proposal to increase the number of authorized shares. This proposal only involves an increase in the authorized share reserve and will not immediately increase the actual number of shares issued. Simultaneously, the company launched its first series of embodied intelligent robots and opened non-refundable, non-binding pre-orders, with the first deliveries expected by the end of this month. Regarding its robotics business, the company is advancing key tasks such as mass production preparation, customized development, testing and verification, and AI data training, continuously driving the dual-engine growth curve of its two core product categories—EAI vehicles and robots.On February 14th, the Peoples Bank of China, the State Financial Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs jointly issued the "Opinions on Coordinating the Establishment of a Regular Financial Support Mechanism to Help Prevent Poverty and Promote Rural Revitalization." The Opinions emphasize strengthening financial resource investment in key areas, improving financial services for grain and oil production, and supporting the improvement of comprehensive agricultural production capacity and quality. It also calls for developing supply chain financial service scenarios such as accounts receivable financing to ensure the financial needs of the entire agricultural industry chain and expand the financial supply for county-level industries that benefit farmers. Furthermore, it emphasizes increasing medium- and long-term investment in rural infrastructure construction and supporting the integrated development of agriculture, culture, and tourism. The Opinions also stress strengthening financial service capacity building and improving the financial organization system. Finally, it calls for deepening the implementation of the demonstration project of financial technology empowering rural revitalization, promoting the popularization and application of emerging payment methods such as mobile payment, and continuing the evaluation of "credit users, credit villages, credit townships" and new agricultural business entities to solidify basic rural financial services.On February 14th, the Peoples Bank of China, the State Financial Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs jointly issued the "Opinions on Coordinating the Establishment of a Regular Financial Support Mechanism to Help Prevent Poverty and Promote Rural Revitalization." The Opinions require strengthening the synergy of multiple financial sectors, leveraging the financing function of the bond market, and encouraging financial institutions, especially local legal entity financial institutions in underdeveloped areas, to issue special financial bonds for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and agriculture. It also calls for building a comprehensive capital market support system and continuing the "green channel" policy for enterprise listing. Furthermore, it emphasizes the innovative development of insurance products and services. The Opinions stress strengthening policy guarantees and implementation, fully leveraging the incentive role of monetary and credit policies, and guiding financial institutions to continuously increase credit resources for rural revitalization, especially for those preventing poverty and those in underdeveloped areas. Finally, it calls for establishing and improving a regular statistical and dynamic monitoring mechanism for the effectiveness of financial assistance policies, and regularly tracking and analyzing the implementation results.On February 14th, the Peoples Bank of China, the State Financial Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs jointly issued the "Opinions on Coordinating the Establishment of a Regular Financial Support Mechanism to Help Prevent Poverty and Promote Rural Revitalization." The Opinions propose to improve the long-term mechanism for development-oriented financial assistance to key groups, adjust and optimize microcredit for those lifted out of poverty, improve policies for small-scale credit loans to farmers, and provide regular support for those preventing a return to poverty. It also emphasizes leveraging the role of finance in supporting industrial development, encouraging financial institutions to develop loans for distinctive and advantageous industries, and allowing eligible regions to increase the upper limit of guaranteed loans for entrepreneurship. Furthermore, it establishes a tiered and categorized financial support mechanism for underdeveloped areas, prioritizing new financial funds and services for key counties supporting rural revitalization. Finally, it calls for increased financial resource allocation to ethnic minority areas, old revolutionary base areas, and border regions.On February 14th, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and two other departments issued a notice entitled "Guiding Opinions on Upgrading and Improving the Quality of the Brewing Industry (2026-2030)," which mentions supporting the comparative analysis of domestic and international standards and formulating product grading, classification, and testing standards in line with international standards. It encourages enterprises to conduct overseas investment and acquisitions of raw material bases, wineries, packaging centers, and distribution channels in a reasonable and compliant manner, strengthen international exchanges and cooperation, and optimize the global production capacity layout. It also encourages enterprises to participate in international exhibitions and promotional activities to promote more products into international duty-free shops and international chain restaurants. Furthermore, it supports the "integration and collaborative export" of Chinese liquors such as baijiu and huangjiu with Chinese cuisine. Simultaneously, it encourages liquor distribution enterprises to deeply connect with production enterprises and share resources, transforming from traditional wholesale and retail agencies to brand agencies and chain operations. Finally, it supports enterprises to strengthen production and sales connections with large e-commerce platforms, deepen the omnichannel layout of production, distribution, sales, and services, and support the standardized development of new business models such as community e-commerce, live-streaming e-commerce, cross-border e-commerce, and instant retail. Local governments and businesses are encouraged to integrate alcohol consumption elements into nighttime economy districts, specialty restaurant clusters, and large commercial complexes. Support will be given to the development of new consumption platforms such as various pubs, creative markets, and themed streets to create immersive consumption experiences. Businesses will be encouraged to enrich residents daily lives through smart displays, themed pop-ups, cultural salons, and cultural and sports activities in urban business districts and residential communities.

Google stock split history: what you need to understand

Cyril Sarratt

Dec 02, 2021 15:55

截屏2021-12-02 下午3.20.16.png


The Google stock split was controversial by lots of investors' standards. Here, we explain what the Google stock split was, how it affected share rates and whether there will be another one in the future.

Google stock split history

The first thing to think about when looking at Google's stock split history, is that the company has two categories of publicly-traded stock. GOOGL shares are otherwise known as class A, and GOOG shares are otherwise called class C.

 

Class A shares were the only ones which were publicly available until 3 April 2014, when Google issued a stock split to produce the class C shares. The table listed below provides info about the results of the split of class A stock to produce the class C stock.

Google class A stock (GOOGL) divides

The split was to guarantee that the founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, kept overall ballot control of the company, while likewise minimizing Google's then share price by half. This was achieved by creating the new class C stock, which does not carry any voting rights at investor meetings.

 

This was controversial at the time due to the fact that instead of simply releasing fresh stock, Google developed a new classification of stock with reduced voting advantages. Nevertheless, other companies such as Facebook (FB), Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Under Armour (UA) have since seen the advantages of maintaining ballot rights on top level of business governance.

 

Another split happened on 27 April 2015, and it only applied to class C stock. Instead of a stock split in the traditional sense, it was a kind of compensation which granted 2.7455 shares for each 1000 currently owned by an investor. This was done on the assumption that class C stock would trade at a discount to class A due to its lack of voting power, which is discussed in greater information later on in this article. 

Google class C stock (GOOG) splits

Aside from class A and C shares, there are likewise Google class B shares which are owned by a handful of directors and the two creators. Class B shares have ten-times the ballot power of class A stock and owners of class B shares likewise received one class C share for each class B share they held at the time of the first split on 3 April 2014.

Google stock split example

For an example of the Google stock split on 3 April 2014, let's assume that a trader owned 1000 Google shares prior to the split. After the split, they would now own 1000 shares of Google class A, in addition to 998 shares of Google class C, because the split was 1998/1000.

 

As of 31 January 2019, there were 299,360,029 shares of class A stock outstanding, 46,535,019 shares of class B stock outstanding and 349,291,348 class C shares impressive.1.

 

Despite the relatively low variety of class B shares in blood circulation, these shares have 465,350,190 votes thanks to their ten-times voting power. This is a substantial increase on the publicly-available class A stocks, which only carry 299,360,029 votes.

Google stock classes: what do they mean?

There are presently 3 classes of Google stock: A, B and C. Each of these different classes is discussed in higher information listed below.

Google stock class A 

Google class A (GOOGL) shares have consistently traded at a premium compared to their class C equivalents. This is since the market designates a value to the ballot power that an investor will get if they buy class A stock.

 

The premium is normally between 1% -5%, for class A, however the two classifications of publicly-traded Google stocks generally move in close tandem.

 

For example, in between January 2018 and January 2019, the closing rate of class A stock varied from $984.66 per share to $1285.50 per share. In contrast, the closing price of Google class C stock ranged from $976.21 to $1268.32 per share.

 

While they do not grant as much voting power as class B shares, owning class A shares is the only way that a typical investor or a Google outsider will be able to vote on decisions at stockholder conferences.

Google stock class B

Class B shares are held by experts, directors and the founders at Alphabet and Google. The majority of this category of Google stock is owned by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, with a smaller sized amount being held by former Google ceo (CEO) Eric E. Schmidt, independent director L. John Doerr and senior vice-president and chief legal officer David C. Drummond.

 

Many argue that investing in Alphabet, just like with many Silicon Valley companies, is an investment in the leadership and the creators more than anything. As a result, by keeping bulk ballot control of their business, Page and Brin ensure that investor confidence in their company remains high, so long as they both stay at the helm.

Google stock class C

Google class C (GOOGL) were produced following the very first stock split in April 2014, and ownership of these shares give no ballot advantages at investor conferences. Google stock class C trades at a slight discount rate to its class An equivalent, however the two costs typically relocate connection.

 

Given that its development, Google stock class C has been 'split' as soon as. As formerly pointed out, this was not a stock split in the standard sense. Rather, it was a type of compensating financiers in class C shares on the assumption that they would trade at a small discount rate to class A shares.

 

This payment, in the form of 2.7455 shares for each 1000 class C shares that an investor held, was given if the stock cost of class C and A varied by more than 1% in the first year. Since this very first year, class C investors have not been compensated for any variances in price.

 

The production of class C shares likewise allowed Google to offer stock rewards to employees and executive officers, and earnings raised by offering the shares has facilitated acquisitions without requiring Page or Brin to give up bulk control of their business.

Will Google stock split again?

Lots of financiers are presently hypothesizing over whether Google will equip split once again. For one, the present share price makes the stocks inaccessible to particular financiers, particularly those who trade part-time or do not have a lot of capital.

 

Larry Page and Sergey Brin have stated, however, that they aren't worried by this and that they prefer their financiers to have a long-lasting interest in Google's vision rather than those investors and traders looking for to make a fast profit from Google stock.

 

Considering That Page and Brin hold a bulk of the ballot share in between them, any future stock split or increase in voting power for shareholders will need to be approved by both of the creators in order for it to pass through the board. If their previous ballot record is anything to go on, this seems not likely at present.

 

Disclaimer: for the function of this post, since all divides took place before the formation of Alphabet Inc., we have described the stock divides as 'Google' stock splits, rather than stock splits of Alphabet.