• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
Fitch: The rating upgrade reflects the strengthening of Portugals public finances, including the expected downward trend in government debt.Barclays: Oil outflows from the Middle East are higher than in the early stages of the conflict, but the market remains in a state of shortage, and the inventory buffer is now greatly reduced.According to Al Arabiya TV: Lebanese official data shows that Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon tonight have killed three people.On September 5th, stronger-than-expected US August jobs data triggered renewed bets on a possible Federal Reserve rate hike, but Wall Street risk assets did not show significant panic. Data showed increased resilience in the job market, leading traders to raise their expectations for a rate hike at the Feds September 16th meeting. US Treasuries experienced a sell-off, the dollar strengthened, and the S&P 500 fell on Friday but still recorded a weekly gain. Unlike previous rate hikes that often triggered capital outflows, this round of bond market adjustments has not yet spread to other risk assets. Credit spreads remain low, limiting pressure on corporate bonds and stock index markets. JPMorgan Chase stated that US Treasury liquidity has deteriorated significantly, but corporate bond ETFs and stock index futures markets have not yet experienced similar tension. Market resilience mainly stems from economic growth and corporate profits, especially as AI investment continues to drive large-scale capital expenditures by technology companies. Analysts point out that the market is currently more focused on whether yields will rise rapidly than on the jobs data itself. The market focus will shift to inflation data and whether the Fed will reconsider its rate hike path due to inflationary pressures. If yields rise further rapidly, it could force investors to reduce their risk exposure.US officials: The White House has no plans to hold an artificial intelligence meeting in mid-September.

Cruise Lines Will Contest A U.S. Court's Huge Award For A Havana Dock

Aria Thomas

Jan 04, 2023 11:22

3.png


Carnival (NYSE:CCL) Corp and Royal Caribbean (NYSE:RCL) Cruises stated on Tuesday that they will appeal a U.S. court verdict ordering them and two other cruise operators to pay $110 million in penalties for usage of a port seized by the Cuban government in 1960.


U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom ruled last week in Miami to award $440 million to the plaintiff, Delaware-registered Havana Docks Corp; registered to two U.S. residents claiming to be descendants of the original proprietors of the Havana Cruise Port Terminal.


It followed Bloom's March finding that the port's use constituted trafficking in seized Havana Docks Corp. property. The ruling represented a turning point for Cuban-Americans seeking restitution for confiscated property during the Cold War.


The judgment against Carnival granted the plaintiff $109,671,180.90 in damages, whilst the rulings against Norwegian, Royal Caribbean, and MSC, the most recent of which was released on Tuesday, each awarded the plaintiff $109,848,747.87 in damages.


Royal Caribbean confirmed to Reuters that it "disagrees with the verdict and expects to appeal." Carnival claimed that it strongly disagreed with the verdict, that it would appeal, and that it had participated in "legal travel."


Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) declined to comment, and MSC Cruises did not provide a response to a request for comment.


Under the Helms-Burton Act, which authorizes U.S. residents to sue over the use of property taken in Cuba after 1959, Havana Docks filed action against the cruise lines.


"This is an extraordinarily significant ruling by Judge Bloom. According to Roberto Martinez, counsel for Havana Docks, the commercial use of confiscated property in Cuba in contravention of U.S. law bears clear, well-defined, and extensively published legal penalties.


"The incontrovertible data revealed that the cruise lines profited over $1.2 billion from their trips that exploited the stolen facility, but did not compensate Havana Docks Corp or the Cuban people," he stated.


The decisions could spark future lawsuits by Cuban exiles seeking compensation for confiscations of property by the late Cuban leader Fidel Castro, believed to be worth $2 billion.