• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On March 31, the Monetary Policy Committee of the Peoples Bank of China held its first quarterly meeting (the 112th overall) for 2026 on March 26. The meeting analyzed the domestic and international economic and financial situation, concluding that the impact of changes in the external environment is deepening, global economic momentum is weak, geopolitical and trade conflicts are frequent, the economic performance of major economies is diverging, and there is uncertainty regarding inflation trends and monetary policy adjustments. While my countrys economy is generally stable and progressing steadily, with new achievements in high-quality development, it still faces problems and challenges such as strong supply and weak demand, and external shocks. The meeting stressed the need to continue implementing a moderately loose monetary policy, increase counter-cyclical and cross-cyclical adjustments, better leverage the dual functions of monetary policy tools in terms of both quantity and structure, strengthen the coordination of monetary and fiscal policies, and promote stable economic growth and a reasonable recovery in prices.On March 31, the Monetary Policy Committee of the Peoples Bank of China held its first quarterly meeting (the 112th overall) for 2026 on March 26. The meeting emphasized the need to guide large banks to play a leading role in serving the real economy, and to encourage small and medium-sized banks to focus on their core businesses and enhance their capital strength. It stressed the importance of making good use of various structural monetary policy tools, optimizing tool management, and solidly implementing the "five major tasks" of financial development, strengthening financial support for key areas such as expanding domestic demand, technological innovation, and small and micro enterprises. The meeting also emphasized the need to continue providing financial services to support the development and growth of the private economy, maintain the stable operation of the financial market, and effectively promote high-level two-way opening up of the financial sector, improving economic and financial management capabilities and risk prevention and control capabilities under open conditions.March 31 – Eurozone inflation surged this month, exceeding the European Central Banks (ECB) 2% target, driven by a sharp rise in oil and gas prices. This has exacerbated the policy dilemma, as high energy costs are dragging down economic growth and also risk triggering an inflationary spiral. Data released by Eurostat on Tuesday showed that the eurozones overall inflation rate rose to 2.5% in March from 1.9% in the previous month, with energy costs rising by 4.9%. A rapid rise in energy inflation could easily spread if businesses factor in increased costs and workers demand higher wages due to declining real disposable income. ECB President Christine Lagarde stated last week that if the central bank remains on hold, the public may begin to question its commitment to combating inflation, which would strengthen the case for raising interest rates even in the event of a large but short-lived inflationary shock. Financial markets currently expect the ECB to raise interest rates three times this year, with the first potentially in April or June. While some officials, including Bundesbank President Jean-Claude Nagel, have indicated that a rate hike as early as April is an option, others, such as Executive Board member Schnabel, have warned against hasty action.According to Nikkei, Fujitsu will outsource the production of its advanced AI chips to Rapidus.According to Nikkei: Fujitsu will develop an advanced 1.4-nanometer AI chip.

Australia's highest court decides Google is not liable for defamation

Charlie Brooks

Aug 18, 2022 10:51

1.png


The highest court in Australia reversed a judgment that found Google guilty of defamation for providing a link to a contested newspaper article on Wednesday, focussing attention on how internet libel cases are handled in the country.


The seven-judge panel of the High Court of Australia ruled 5 to 2 to reverse an earlier ruling that the Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc subsidiary was involved in the publication of the contentious article by acting as a "library" holding it, stating that the website had no active role.


In Australia, the question of who is responsible for internet-based libel has simmered for years. This decision increases the difficulty. An evaluation of the country's libel law that has lasted years has not yet produced a conclusive answer as to whether Google and Facebook (NASDAQ:META) should be held accountable.


According to the published judgment, the issue stems from a 2004 article alleging that a criminal defense attorney exceeded professional bounds by becoming a "confidant" of criminals. According to the judgment, attorney George Defteros uncovered a connection to the article via a Google search of his name in 2016 and had Google remove it after 150 people viewed it.


A state court determined that Google is a publisher and ordered the company to pay Defteros A$40,000 (US$28,056). Google appealed the conviction, culminating in the verdict issued on Wednesday.


"The Underworld article was not authored by any of the appellant's employees or agents," two panel judges noted in a ruling issued on Wednesday.


"It was written by a journalist unaffiliated with the appellant and published by a newspaper over which the appellant had no influence or control."


Google "does not own or control the internet," they said.


A Google representative was unavailable for immediate comment.


Despite the fact that Google was not found accountable, Defteros felt vindicated because the court agreed that the article was defamatory.


The decision was rendered after the High Court determined last year that a newspaper publisher was liable for defamatory comments posted on Facebook beneath an article it had posted.


The media companies "invited and promoted" comments last year, however Google "did not create a space or area where it could be sent nor did it encourage the drafting of response comments," the judges decided.