• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
FedEx (FDX.N) is suing the U.S. government, demanding a full refund of emergency tariffs.February 24th - According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is considering new "national security tariffs" on six industries. Sources familiar with the matter revealed that the tariffs under consideration could cover industries such as large batteries, pig iron and iron fittings, plastic pipes, industrial chemicals, and power grid and telecommunications equipment. These tariffs would be imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The new tariffs on these six industries would be implemented separately from the new 15% global tariff. It is unclear when the investigations into these tariffs, conducted by the Department of Commerce, will be announced, or when they will ultimately be implemented. Section 232 requires a lengthy investigation before tariffs can be imposed, but once implemented, the president can unilaterally amend it.February 24 - On February 23 local time, the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the foreign ministers of 19 countries, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, Palestine, Brazil, France, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Indonesia, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden, along with the secretaries-general of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, issued a joint statement strongly condemning the Israeli security cabinet for approving a series of decisions that drastically altered its policies in the West Bank, strengthened its control over the West Bank, and accelerated the expansion of Jewish settlements.JPMorgan CFO Barnum: The final Basel III plan is unlikely to significantly change capital requirements in any direction.Musk: Anthropic stole training data on a massive scale and paid billions of dollars in compensation for it. This is an indisputable fact.

Australia Prohibits Telstra-TPG Wireless Broadband Merger, Triggering A Lawsuit

Haiden Holmes

Dec 22, 2022 11:39

11.png


Australia's antitrust authority halted an asset transfer transaction between Telstra (OTC:TLSYY) and TPG, the country's largest and third-largest wireless internet providers, citing competition concerns, laying the stage for a judicial battle over access to four million consumers.


In a February-announced arrangement, Telstra Group was to acquire wireless internet-carrying spectrum and transmission towers from TPG Telecom Ltd, but TPG would continue to sell 4G and 5G service using what would become Telstra's infrastructure. They did not provide financial information.


However, Optus, the No. 2 wireless internet provider and a subsidiary of Singapore Telecommunications, rejected the acquisition on the grounds that it would increase Telstra's market domination.


Wednesday, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) voted against the proposal, citing the possibility that TPG and Optus will invest less in vital infrastructure.


Telstra and TPG stated that they will appeal the ACCC's decision, which they described as disappointing and a missed opportunity for the 17 percent of Australia's 25 million-person population that would be affected by the merger.


The judgment sets up TPG and the ACCC for their second court confrontation in less than two years. The ACCC banned TPG's acquisition of CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd's Vodafone (NASDAQ:VOD) Hutchison Australia, but the Federal Court overruled it in 2020 and allowed the deal to proceed.


It represents a bright point for Optus, which faced severe criticism, notably from the federal government, after disclosing in October a data breach affecting around 10 million customer accounts.


"By rejecting this acquisition, the ACCC has helped ensure that our regional areas will continue to benefit from competition," stated Kelly Bayer Rosmarin, chief executive officer of Optus (OTC:BAYRY).


Shares of Telstra, which already has the most users in most of Australia's major internet and telecommunications markets, were flat at midday on Wednesday, while shares of TPG were down 3%, compared to the market's 1.3% rise.


UBS analysts noted in a client note about TPG, "An failed appeal to the Australian Competition Tribunal might have a longer-term... impact on our EBITDA expectations, discounting the impact from possible further expenditure required to enhance regional networks."


Paul Budde, an independent observer of telecommunications, stated that the ACCC's focus on infrastructure ownership rather than services demonstrated that Australian competition legislation was out of sync with practical reality.


"You could argue that the ACCC has failed to move in that direction, or that the sector should have advocated for a comprehensive review of telecoms regulation," he wrote in an email.


"The industry and the ACCC will need to sit down and devise a new regulatory regime that accounts for reality," he continued.